Thursday, March 29, 2012

Week 2: Player Piano (1952)


Vonnegut's first novel, Player Piano, was first published by Charles Scribners and Sons in 1952, only two years after he first started placing stories in "slicks" — popular weekly magazines that catered to large audiences and provided writers with ample and lucrative opportunities to see their stories in print — including "Report on the Barnhouse Effect" and "EPICAC," which you read for today. This early financial success provided the motivation Vonnegut needed to quit his public relations job at General Electric in Schenectady, NY and move to Cape Cod to pursue writing full-time, however the periodical market dried up not long thereafter. Here's Vonnegut's own description of that time period, from the preface to Bagombo Snuff Box:
There was a crazy seller’s market for short stories in 1950. There were four weekly magazines that published three or more things in every issue. Six monthlies did the same.

I got me an agent. If I sent him a story that didn’t quite work, wouldn’t quite satisfy a reader, he would tell me how to fix it. Agents and editors back then could tell a writer how to fine-tune a story as though they were pit mechanics and the story were a race car. With help like that, I sold one, and then two, and then three stories, and banked more money than a year’s salary at GE.

I quit GE and started my first novel, Player Piano. It is a lampoon on GE. I bit the hand that used to feed me. The book predicted what has indeed come to pass, a day when machines, because they are so dependable and efficient and tireless, and getting cheaper all the time, are taking the halfway decent jobs from human beings. [...]

But three years after I left Schenectady, advertisers started withdrawing their money from magazines. [...] One monthly that had brought several of my stories, Cosmopolitan, now survives as a harrowingly explicit sex manual.
Vonnegut in 1952.
Player Piano revisits themes that should be familiar after today's readings, namely, as the cover copy reads, "America in the Coming Age of Electronics," and just as importantly, the place of humans within this technocratic society, and aside from general nuclear anxieties, much of Vonnegut's interest in rapidly-advancing technology was born of his experience at GE, as filtered through a mild sibling rivalry with his pragmatic brother, Bernard, a star scientist for the organization who, among other achievements, discovered a process for cloud seeding. The humanist vs. scientist dynamic was an active one in the Vonnegut family — for example, influenced by Bernard's analytic nature, Vonnegut's father would force him to major in chemistry at Cornell, turning down a dream job in journalism. Likewise, there's an interesting analogue in Vonnegut's longtime association with the science-fiction genre — something he disdained as an attempt to marginalize his writing and diminish the sharpness of his social commentary.  Writing on the topic in The New York Times in 1965, he observes:
Years ago I was working in Schenectady for General Electric, completely surrounded by machines and ideas for machines, so I wrote a novel about people and machines, and machines frequently got the best of it, as machines will. (It was called Player Piano, and it's coming out in hard covers again next spring.) And I learned from the reviewers that I was a science-fiction writer.

I didn't know that. I supposed that I was writing a novel about life, about things I could not avoid seeing and hearing in Schenectady, a very real town, awkwardly set in the gruesome now. I have been a sore-headed occupant of a file-drawer labeled ''science- fiction'' ever since, and I would like out, particularly since so many serious critics regularly mistake the drawer for a tall white fixture in a comfort station. 

The way a person gets into this drawer, apparently, is to notice technology. The feeling persists that no one can simultaneously be a respectable writer and understand how a refrigerator works, just as no gentleman wears a brown suit in the city.
If you're wondering what Utopia 14 is, by the way, it was Bantam's 1954 attempt to cash in on the popularity of science fiction pulp novels, rebranding Player Piano to appeal to that market (note the futuristic city/machine/spaceship thingy[?], the alien-like creatures, the unforgiving landscape, the enigmatic hero). Vonnegut was justifiably angered by this, however the book wasn't republished under its original title until 1966, after the success of Cat's Cradle.

General Electric would also greatly influence Cat's Cradle, in which Dr. Felix Hoenikker was based on Nobel Prize-winner Irving Langmuir (one of Bernard's colleagues), and while GE is proud to acknowledge that (scroll down), they aren't as eager to own up to the more critical depiction in Player Piano.

Here's our reading schedule for the week:
  • Tuesday, April 3rd: Chapters 1-20 (pgs 1-209)
  • Thursday, April 5th: Chapters 21-35 (pgs 210-341)

Discussion facilitators will be chosen today and they should post their questions as comments on this thread prior to class.  Additionally, here are a few supplemental links:
  • Granville Hicks' New York Times review of Player Piano: [link]
  • "The Invention of Kurt Vonnegut" — a discussion of the author's time at GE: [link]
  • Vonnegut on science fiction, GE and Player Piano (from a 1973 Playboy interview): [link]
  • Vonnegut on Player Piano, "technology and cheesy little religions" (from a 1973 interview with Robert Scholes): [link]
  • Wikipedia entry on ENIAC, the world's first general-purpose computer, developed at the University of Pennsylvania in 1947 (and most likely a real-world analogue for EPICAC): [link]

5 comments:

  1. 1. In what ways are Paul and Anita’s relationship and the different mentalities toward modern technology similar?

    2. How to the experiences of the Shah relate to the lack of understanding and cooperation between cultures today?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1: “He’d pull me back into the center, and I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can’t see from the center. Big, undreamed-of things – the people on the edge see them first.”
    Paul Proteus begins the novel in the “center” of his society as a general manager of the Illium Industrial Plant, climbing the hierarchy of the American industry. His rising success is supported and influenced by various figures, including his kind and fatherly superior, Kroner, his encouraging wife, Anita and his late but highly celebrated father. In the midst of his rising success, Paul begins drifting to the “edge” of society so-to-speak when he buys a rural farm free of machines, contemplates quitting his job and begins hanging out with Finnerty and Lasher in the Homestead section of town.
    What indications of Paul’s “shift to the edge” arise in the text and what struggles does he face along his journey? One example of a time when Paul is pulled back from the edge is in chapter 9:
    “Paul felt wonderful, at one with the saloon, and by extension, with all humanity and the universe. He felt witty, and on the verge of a splendid discovery. Then he remembered. ‘Holy God! Anita!’”


    2. Traveling from a foreign land, the Shah of Bratpuhr lives “on the edge” and brings an outside perspective and insight to the American way of life. He questions the society’s reliance on machines and instead observes the machines’ reliance on citizens as “slaves”. He declares EPICAC a “false god” and is baffled by the idea of patriotism and it’s power over the people. Instead of admiring a society that grants worth on intelligence alone, the Shah recognizes the hypocrisy and flaws in the value system used in Illium.
    How does the Shah’s foreign view reveal deceptions in the government and the ruse of peace and ideology it presents to the American people?

    -Brooke Beery

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. As Paul developes his new understanding of life he wishes to share it with Anita, but her superficial and trivial conversation topics always interupt him of what he is trying to say focusing only on the task at hand.
    "She was of such a methodical nature that when something of importance was in the offing, other aspects of life could haveno importance at all. To her it seemed almost indecent to give attention to anything but the crucial matter of the Meadows."
    Later in the chapter Paul tries to reason with Anita about their lifestyle but after some craft convincing my Anita Paul gives up on the matter "The punch was gone from his voice, and he felt drugged, a drowsiness from a little too much to drink, from a scrambling over a series of emotional peacks and puts, from utter frustration"
    Similar to Paul’s quick surrender and Anita’s convincing words, many people do not need to hear much in order to convince them that a technology they were once opposed to is now nothing less than a necessity.

    In what ways are Paul and Anita’s relationship and the different mentalities toward modern technology similar?


    -Mariah Acord

    2. The Shah of Bratphur is introduced into the book in chapter 2 as a spiritual leader who “had left his military and spiritual fastness in the mountains to see what he could learn in the most powerful nation on earth for the good of his people.” (19-20) Throughout his limited appearances in the book the Shah tries to understand the structure of our economy and lifestyle. He is the outside view of the world that can be seen as similar to the frequent misunderstandings and lack of cooperation between countries and cultures in the real world.

    How to the experiences of the Shah relate to the lack of understanding and cooperation between cultures today?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1. How does Vonnegut compare religion to machines?

    2. How does machinery become an enemy by the end of the book?

    - Pat Strang

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. Player Piano is an example of dystopian fiction, meaning that the society in which Paul lives is characterized by human suffering and oppression. Player Piano is good example of how hope plays into dystopian narratives. Even though they know they will fail, all though it is not reveled to the reader until later in the book, The Ghost Shirt Society rises in rebellion against the machine run society in which they live. Despite their imminent failure, they fight on. Why do you think this is?


    2. At the end of the book, after the rebellion was over, the people of the homestead began trying to rebuild what they had just spent months planning to destroy. Why?

    ReplyDelete